| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (106)

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Looks good but I will only get it when it gets ported to the XB720 or PS4 (PS3 if its as powerful as people say it is).

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:06PM fwacce said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Some people like to be reminded of how when they were young, they went to the store and bought something that they had been waiting for. To keep something as new as it was on the shelf, is something special to some people. It's really all about memories, not including the investors.

The more important question is why do you care? What difference does it make if someone wants to keep something sealed or open it and play it? How is your life going to change if someone leaves the cellophane on a game? And why would you go out and find a forum on the internet and come back here to post and complain about it, when it doesn't affect you? To me, it's always been more about someone's own ego as to why you would insist on telling other people what to do with their stuff.

Live and let live.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:07PM fwacce said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Eh... Way wrong post on way wrong topic. Damn joystiq's system sucks.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 6:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
lol I was like: "WTF!?"
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:05PM zsavior said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Is 1up in its last days and they are just deciding to stick it hard to people? WOW I mean wow the last two reviews have been just well, honest. You guys are going to get flamed for not going along with the crowd but, damn this almost makes me what to check out 1up.

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Scores usually are a bit lower from 1up and have been for a while. I noticed this on Wii reviews and thought they just had a chip on their shoulders about the Wii, but I'm happy to see that their venomous reviews spread across all platforms.

Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:26PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
They're incredibly strange. They sit there and bitch about the game but give it an 80. Hardly "sticking it to someone".
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 7:05PM Negativecool said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I wonder if they even like playing games anymore.

All of their reviews seem to bash everything for lack of advancement towards some utopia of unbelievable gaming experiences.

Can't a game be a fucking game without needing to re-invent the god damn wheel?
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 7:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Negativecool

If you ask me, 80/100 for something that "plays it safe" is more than fair.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 8:20PM Spiza said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I think reviewers are getting their signals crossed on which overhyped games they are supposed to be giving 100s and which overhyped games they are supposed to be overly critical of. The results are games getting both mediocre and perfect scores. It's hilarious.

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Ah, forgot to add, why only three scores in every meta-review column? Every one of these games has more than three reviews out by the time you post this, it would be am uch better sample to post 5 or 7.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
go to metacritic to see the other scores

they can only make each post here a certain length
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:06PM Giantenemycrab said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
1up is in a bad mood today.

Posted: Nov 14th 2007 9:35AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Don't matter, nobody can play this game anyway... :)

Posted: Nov 14th 2007 11:24AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
???...
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:09PM R V said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
All I need to do is buy the 8800gt for $250 and I'm set, I meet all the other min requirements. But with mass effect, assassins creed, and cod4, I'm not sure Ill h ave time for crysis even if I did buy it.

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:22PM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have an 8800 gts, and I can barely run the game above 1024x768 (all settings on demo set to high). I've got a Core 2 Duo 2.3Ghz, 2Gb Ram.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:27PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The 8800 GT is better than the GTS. Strangely, it is just a hair slower than the GTX.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 9:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have an 8800 GTS and I'm getting a solid 30+ FPS with all of the Very high DX10 stuff enabled in XP. Wait, are you on Vista?
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
GOTY 2010

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:12PM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh come on... 100/100? The game is just Far Cry with super powers!

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Far Cry got pretty high scores back in the day.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:26PM NukeAssault said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I know rite?

Look the game is fun and all but its far from spectacular. Other then its visuals its got nothing else to offer me.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:28PM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My point is that this is nothing but the same old game with a higher tech requirement.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
you must not have played farcry because you get super powers in farcry too lol
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 6:43PM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I did, but I guess I forgot about that... or at least, I tried to. The last quarter of the game is just a huge waste of time.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 7:08PM einhanderkiller said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Truepatriot, you're thinking about Far Cry: Instincts, the average spin-off for consoles made by Ubisoft.
Reply

Posted: Nov 14th 2007 9:07AM MagusDF said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dunno if its the same old game. The engine changed the graphics but the AI is what changed the game...

That aside if their engine went for sale therd be more to be excited about.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:13PM blehh said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Christ is awesome, but so is crysis.

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:28PM FredFredrickson said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Looks like someone's been spending a wee bit too much time at church.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Is that dog shit on your waffles?
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 6:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I loled on that dog shit comment but your right...maybe cat poop?
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 10:04PM Jacksons said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Looks like fried chicken to me.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Then again, many games would look amazing if you use the specs Crysis wants you to use (though granted, possibly not as amazing as Crysis itself)

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
100/100 is the new 80/100!

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:28PM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agreed.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:49PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Right on Clack!
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Fuck you, Dan Dormer.

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Did you perhaps mean to remark on the poor grammar and syntax? If so then I agree.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 6:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Grammar, syntax, spelling, tone, and point. Seriously, this is the worst post I've ever seen on Joystiq.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 6:20PM Shagittarius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sha-na-na-na...
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 10:10PM Jacksons said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, I've long since given up keeping my computer up to the bleeding edge, but this article had a pretty bad tone on it (among a flurry of syntax problems). Fairly odd for a website wearing a crysis ad right below this comment box I'm currently typing in. A potshot can be funny, but that whole article was anti-PC. Someone having some PC troubles or something? (Could you imagine if it were targeted at 360, Wii or PS3? Haha, this thread would be at 900 comments.)
Reply

Posted: Nov 14th 2007 2:26AM SomeDudeFromOz said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
His last one was no better...
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:30PM ratm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
1UP. Giving Halo 3 - a mediocre game in every single aspect - 10's, and bashing games with innovation (ex. Crysis/Assassin's Creed). How appropriate, you fight like a cow.

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:42PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How is Crysis innovative (seriously)? I haven't played it yet, but from what I've seen it looks like FarCry except you get "powers" from a suit instead of from genetic enhancements/drugs.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:50PM ratm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dynamic approach to each situation combined with the use of suit power on the go is enough of an innovation for an fps.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 5:59PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, innovative or not the game does look good. I plan to guyit as soon as I get my rig updated. Which I hope to do right after the holidays. Need to see what kind of funds I have left to put toward the update.
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 6:02PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*buy it
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2007 6:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I'm pretty sure a game that is mediocre in all aspects doesn't earn a 94 metacritic after 73 reviews. You make yourself seem silly and your opinions worthless when you say these kinds of things.

-signed- not a Halo fanatic
Reply

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW